Constitutional Saboteurs from the Global Fascist Commie Unionist Corporate Criminal Regimes ;

Perhaps we all missed the memo
where US taxpayers are gleefully funding
Islamic "mosques, schools, institutes, and
community centers" around the globe.

Of course, US troops have restored hundreds
of schools and community centers in Iraq and
Afghanistan, but mosques and Islamic institutes?
This seems very difficult to believe.

So, as an enraged and curious taxpaying citizen,
I have a few questions for our Congress
and this Administration.

What are the locations, costs,
and dates of construction of these US
taxpayer-funded mosques and Islamic institutes?

If some of these mosques
were built in the America, didn't
anyone contact the ACLU?

(I would pay real money
to be in "the room" during that discussion.)

What particular piece
of Congressional legislation
authorized US taxpayer dollars
to be spent on these mosques
and Islamic institutes?

Did our government apportion these funds
fairly and equally between the Shi'a, Sunni,
and Sufi sects of Islam?

The Constitution states
"Congress shall make no law
respecting an establishment of religion,
or prohibiting the free exercise thereof;"

I'm damn sure
spending US taxpayer dollars
on constructing mosques was not
envisioned by the Founding Fathers
nor by the overwhelming majority
of American citizens
http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2010/08/newsweek_columnist_says_us_fun.html

The spread of Sharia Law
to the entire world is part of jihad.
In Canada and Britain, jihad is advancing.

A June 2010 report entitled
"Sharia Law in Britain : A Threat
to One Law for All and Equal Rights"
begins with Secretary General of the Islamic
Sharia Council Suhaib Hasan saying,

"If Sharia law is implemented,
then you can turn this country [Great Britain]
into a haven of peace because once a thief's
hand is cut off nobody is going to steal."

Furthermore,
"once just only once,
if an adulterer is stoned
nobody is going to commit
this crime at all," and finally,

"We want to offer it to the British society.
If they accept it, it is for their good and if they
don't accept it they'll need more and more prisons."

This perverse logic is illustrative
of the brutality that is sharia law's
penal code.

The writers of the Report have compiled
evidence of "the discriminatory nature of
these courts and make recommendations
for curtailing sharia and religious tribunals
on the basis that they work against and not
for equality, and are incompatible
with human rights."

The authors explain
that "whilst there is an
obvious difference between
stoning a woman to death and
denying her the right to divorce
and child custody, the fundamentals
and misogyny behind sharia's civil and
penal codes are the same ~ it is just
a matter of degree.

It is deceptive,
or at best a mistake,
not to see the civil aspects
of sharia law as part of and
an extension of its penal code"
http://www.americanthinker.com/2010/08/sharia_law_in_canada_and_brita.html